The DeSart & Holbrook model provided an updated forecast of the election result. According to the model, Clinton will garner 93.8% of the two-party vote share in Washington, D.C., while Trump will end up with 6.2%.
Putting the results in context
As any other method, models are subject to bias. Thus, as a general rule, you should not be overly confident the results of a single econometric model. Rather than relying on results from single models, one should consult combined models or, even better, the combined PollyVote forecast that includes forecasts from different methods, each of which draws upon different data.
Comparison to other econometric models
If we look at an average of Washington, D.C. Econometric models, Clinton's two-party vote share is currently at 0.0%. Compared to her numbers in the DeSart & Holbrook model Clinton's econometric model average is 93.8 percentage points worse.
Comparison to the combined PollyVote
The latest PollyVote expects Clinton to gain 91.4% of the two-party vote in Washington, D.C.. The results of the DeSart & Holbrook model for Clinton are thus 2.4 percentage points above the combined PollyVote in Washington, D.C.. In comparison, a look at the PollyVote national prediction for Clinton indicates that the actual results are 41.1 percentage points higher.