The DeSart model provided an updated forecast of the election outcome. It currently forecasts a two-party vote share of 37.4% for Clinton and 0.0% for Trump in Massachusetts.
Putting the results in context
Individual econometric models often contain large biases, which is why they should be treated with caution. Rather than relying on results from single econometric models, we recommend to consult combined econometric models or, even better, a combined forecast that incorporates forecasts from different methods, each of which draws upon different data.
Comparison to other econometric models
In comparison to the average results of other econometric models Clinton performed worse with 0.0 percentage points, while Trump did better with 0.0 percentage points.