The Rothschild model released an updated forecast of the election result. The model currently predicts a tie, with both Clinton and Trump receiving 50% of the two-party vote.
Putting the results in context
As any other method, econometric models are subject to bias. In general, you should not have too much faith in the results of a single econometric model. Rather than trusting the results from single econometric models, the best practice is to rely on combined econometric models or, even better, the combined PollyVote forecast that uses forecasts from different methods, each of which uses different data.
Results vs. other econometric models
In comparison to the average results of other econometric models Clinton performed worse with 0.0 percentage points, while Trump did better with 0.0 percentage points.
Results compared to the combined PollyVote forecast
Clinton has 64.3 percentage points less and Trump has 64.3 percentage points less when the results of the econometric model are compared to the combined PollyVote forecast for Massachusetts.