The Jerome model provided an updated forecast of the election outcome. The model currently predicts a two-party vote share of 58.5% for Clinton and 41.5% for Trump in Minnesota.
Putting the results in context
As any other method, econometric models are subject to bias. As a result, you should not rely too much on the results of a single econometric model. Instead of relying on results from single econometric models, research in forecasting recommends to consult combined econometric models or, even better, a combined forecast that draws upon forecasts from different methods, each of which draws upon different data.
Comparison to the combined PollyVote
Clinton has 4.7 percentage points more and Trump has 4.7 percentage points less when the results of the econometric model are compared to the combined PollyVote forecast for Minnesota.