The DeSart model provided an updated forecast of the election outcome. It currently predicts a two-party vote share of 69.6% for Clinton and 0.0% for Trump in Idaho. In comparison, on August 4, Clinton was predicted to end up with only 30.4% of the vote.
Putting the results in context
Single econometric models should be interpreted with caution, since they may include large errors. At the very least, one should check how a econometric model's results compare to benchmark forecasts.
Results in comparison to other econometric models
When compared to the average results of other econometric models Clinton performed better with 0.0 percentage points, while Trump did worse with 0.0 percentage points.